I don't even contact Steinberg support, because they never answer anyway. A test showed that Reason as a plugin is loaded by Studio One without any problems. Cubase hangs completely and has to be restarted. Reason as a VST plugin has worked fine so far, but for a few weeks now it just won't load. But a few small haptic problems made me buy Cubase11 or 12 Pro, because I wanted to choose the most comprehensive solution.īut in the meantime I am on the verge of a Rage Quit, and a return to Studio One (now in version 6). Then I got to know Studio One and was quite enthusiastic. And annoyed me about the many shortcomings. Years later, music became relevant to me again and I continued with Reason 10 for now, then 11. I swear this by Johann Pachelbel's Canon in D. I hate Apple for taking over Logic and making it endemic, and that hate is so deep that I will never in my life buy an Apple. Then I got to know Reason and was thrilled, but there was no way to integrate VSTs back then, in 2003. Since we were programming PC games, I unfortunately had to work on PC and couldn't buy a MAC. And computers back then were still slow as hell, especially Windows. They both annoyed me, because I'm an old-school musician, and really only knew four- or eight-track Tascam recorders, or even just a two-track Revox. The very first DAW was Cakewalk, then later Cubase. I started working with DAWs in the early 90s when I had to write 8 bit soundblaster music for computer games. The glitchy copy protection system from Cubase 7 - Cubase 11 (the elicenser) is gone in Cubase 12 and everyone loves the new simpler activation system. I work from "reusable parts of templates" workflow, and for me, both Studio One and Cubase are friendly and easy to use.Īt the end of the day, there is NO more powerful DAW than Cubase Pro. Some people do everything in a template, and while I don't work that way, you can work that way. Cubase's browsing system and preset systems are the best in class, and I simply love Cubase's ability to save and re-load effect chains, track presets, and project templates. Certain parallel processing, very intricate side chaining, or mid-side effect chaining is much easier to do in Studio One.Ĭubase also has the simplest bounce/freeze/render and the BEST stem-rendering and import/export features of any DAW. To be fair, Studio One has some really awesome multi-band and parallel routing features built into the DAW that are not EASY in Cubase, but are possible. I feel StudioOne more or less forces the "rack instrument" VST model on me and I don't like that. I find the StudioOne way of separating tracks from channels as a forced workflow annoying, whereas Cubase offers me both "traditional VST tracks" (because Steinberg invented VSTs, it does them well) and a "rack instrument" model, which is useful in some cases, but more work. I personally like the way Cubase works with VSTs better than the way that StudioOne works with VST instruments. If you want a friendly easy to learn, and very reliable DAW, studio one is wonderful. If you need incredibly powerful and deep mixing and editing features, nothing beats Cubase. If you mostly work IN THE BOX with a bit of vocals, and a lot of electronic VST instruments, Bitwig has many advantages. What genre do you work in and do you need a flexible DAW that can do everything Ableton does and more? Bitwig is like Ableton, but not crashy, and far more powerful, and with its clip launcher and push/launchpad integration, if you have ableton-type DAW controllers in your setup, Bitwig will just feel like home Bitwig is kind of a super ableton, but it lacks things that Studio One and Cubase can offer you for things like recording live instrument and vocal performances and then mixing editing live vocals or instrumentals. If you have been a long time Ableton user, you should consider bitwig as well. The new midi remote control editing and assignment features are unbeatable. Cubase recently (Cubase 12) got perhaps the nicest and most powerful way of setting up all your MIDI control surfaces that I have ever seen. The drag and drop features in Studio One are very nice. Cubase is incredibly powerful, probably more powerful than Studio One, but the workflow is simpler in Studio One. Both Cubase and Studio One are wonderful.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |